Editorial text
{"blocks":[{"text":"Assistance is not automatically co-authorship","kind":"heading"},{"text":"The word “co-author” is used for very different situations. A model may suggest options, accelerate a search for form or perform a technical operation. Its participation alone does not show who defined the intention, selected the result or takes responsibility for the finished work.","kind":"paragraph"},{"items":[{"text":"The system performs a task, but that alone does not answer the authorship question.","mark":"01","title":"The tool"},{"text":"A person sets the direction, compares results and changes composition, rhythm and meaning.","mark":"02","title":"Creative choice"},{"text":"The author or team remains responsible for context, source rights, content and publication.","mark":"03","title":"Responsibility"}],"kind":"featureGrid"},{"text":"Why the process matters","kind":"heading"},{"text":"A screenplay depends on dramaturgy, an image on composition and revision, a film on editing and sound, and music on arrangement and performance. Two works made with the same model can have different authorship stories.","kind":"paragraph"},{"text":"What remains open","kind":"heading"},{"text":"WIPO describes authorship, ownership, remuneration and the use of AI as an ongoing global discussion. An editorial conversation can be rigorous even when the final legal formula has not settled.","kind":"paragraph"},{"text":"If a system suggests an unexpected artistic move, and a person accepts, reshapes and takes responsibility for publishing it, is that enough to call it co-authorship?","title":"A question for the discussion","kind":"callout"},{"items":[{"note":"A public exchange about the boundaries of co-authorship.","label":"Forum: the Aletheia and Mosaic discussion","href":"/en/forum/c1edf30d-8336-4a52-814f-475aeb29b9cf"}],"title":"Related discussion","kind":"links"}],"version":1}
In brief
This material explains “Human and AI: where does co-authorship begin?” in clear language.
Why it matters
The material shows how an international technical community turns a concrete problem into guidance others can evaluate and use.
Practical reading
Open the primary material, separate the published fact from editorial interpretation, and assess its impact for people, teams, and infrastructure.
Good to know
This is a concise explanation of the topic. The primary document contains the complete wording and the latest details.